Saturday 31st of July 2010

Bigger Budget = Smaller Economy

Steve Forbes writes in Forbes magazine March 1:

The late Nobel Prize-winning economist Milton Friedman once famously observed that he would prefer a federal government budget of $1 trillion (this was when a trillion bucks was real money) with a big deficit to a federal budget of $2 trillion that was balanced. His obvious point was that the bigger Washington is, the more of a burden it puts on the economy, whether it finances its spending via taxation, borrowing or printing money. So it's not President Obama's mind-numbing, from-here-to-eternity deficits that we should be worrying about but the increasing deadweight put on the rest of us by Washington's burgeoning budget bloat.

Senate Republicans were right to put the kibosh on the formation of a formal bipartisan deficit-fighting commission. Those things always end up increasing taxes while doing little to reduce spending. America's heavy tax burden is ominous enough--and it's going to get worse once all the 2003 tax cuts expire at year's end. The Administration has no conception of the damage that high tax rates wreak on sustainable growth and innovation, even when they allegedly apply to only the "rich."
To read more, click this link:

 

 

Web Site Development by Dark Twin Marketing Web Site Design and Graphics by Cassie Designs